Demitra's school has a copy of the resource "Puddle Questions: Assessing Mathematical Thinking." In it there is a question about how you would measure a puddle. Demitra decided to modify the question to meet her needs for assessing what the students know about area. She also wanted them to self-reflect on their work and she wanted to be able to give them some descriptive feedback on what they could do better. Sounds like a tall order, but when it fit together nicely and the students really got a lot out of the lesson.
Minds-On: Each group was given a large triangle made out of construction paper. They were asked how they could find out the area of it. They then set to work discussing and trying different ways. What was great was that each group came up with a different way, and they all knew that the units that they used must all be the same.
Action: After being given the task, Demitra reviewed the success criteria that had been co-created together. The students gave examples of what the criteria might look like in terms of the task. For the actual task, the students were asked to draw a puddle and find the area of it. They could use any way they wanted to. Some students drew lines, others used cubes, pentominoes, finger spaces, and some even drew shapes that they thought would be "easy" to count.
Consolidation: Demitra had one-on-one conferences with each of the students to not only assign them a mark (based on the four categories in the achievement chart) but also to give them some feedback on what they had done well on, and what they could improve upon
This lesson left Demitra feeling pretty confident in her student's abilities to find the area of a shape. The one-on-one conferences also helped her ask some deeper questions to help determine the students knowledge and understanding of area and how well they were able to apply that knowledge and understanding to the problem at hand.
No comments:
Post a Comment